I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Updates from the match in Colombo; 1.30pm GMT start
，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
Израиль нанес удар по Ирану09:28
2026-02-28 00:00:00:0王世俭3014269210http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202602/28/content_30142692.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202602/28/content_30142692.html11921 从定西“土山”到江津石佛寺（我家门口有文物）
這對從印度到印尼的各亞洲國家來說是一大打擊。因為，這些國家花費數月時間與華盛頓協商貿易協議，許多國家還業已承諾在美國投資數十億美元。雖然新的稅率對許多原本面臨更高稅率的亞洲經濟體來說似乎是好消息，但分析師告訴BBC，重大的不確定性依然存在。